[Frontiers in Bioscience S3, 788-796, January 1, 2011]

Integrin-linked kinase 1: role in hormonal cancer progression

Valerie Cortez1, 2, Binoj C Nair1,3, Dimple Chakravarty1, Ratna K Vadlamudi1

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2IMGP-Cancer Biology Program, 3Molecular Medicine Program,University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Discussion
3.1. ILK signaling and tumorigenesis
3.2. Expression of ILK in hormonal cancers
3.3. Role of ILK1 in cancer cell metastasis
3.4. ILK-ER signaling crosstalk
3.5. ILK-hormonal therapy resistance
3.6. Therapeutic potential of targeting ILK1 for hormonal cancers
4. Future Perspectives
5. Acknowledgements
6. References

1. ABSTRACT

Integrin-linked kinase 1 (ILK1) is a serine/threonine kinase that plays important roles in a variety of cellular functions including cell survival, migration and angiogenesis. ILK1 is normally expressed in numerous tissues and activated by growth factors, cytokines and hormones. Dysregulation of ILK1 expression or function is found in several hormonal tumors including breast, ovary and prostate. Emerging evidence suggests that ILK overexpression promotes cellular transformation, cell survival, epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), and metastasis of hormonal cancer cells while inhibition of ILK1 reduces tumor growth and progression. The recent development of ILK1 inhibitors has provided novel mechanisms for blocking ILK1 signaling to curb metastasis and therapy resistance of hormonal tumors. This review will focus on recent advances made towards understanding the role of ILK signaling axis in progression of hormonal cancer.

2. INTRODUCTION

ILK1 is a 59 kDa cytoplasmic protein that contains three distinct domains: (a) a phosphoinositide phospholipid-binding domain that mediates phosphoinositide binding, (b) an N-terminal ankyrin repeat domain that facilitates protein interactions and (c) a C-terminal serine/threonine protein kinase domain (1). ILK1 is a serine/threonine kinase that was first discovered as an integrin-binding protein in a yeast two-hybrid screen (2). It is able to directly activate several signaling pathways downstream of integrins and to participate in integrin signaling crosstalk with growth factors and hormones (3, 4). Substrates of the ILK1 include integrin β1 (2), myosin light chain (MLC) (5), protein kinase B /Akt (AKT) and Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) (6). ILK1 is a unique kinase because it also functions as an intracellular adaptor protein, coupling a wide variety of signaling proteins to integrin and growth factor signaling. ILK interacting proteins include Pinch (7), Paxillin (8), Parvins (9), Affixin (10), ILK BP (11), p21 activated kinase 1 (Pak1) (12) and estrogen receptor (ER) (13). Physiological signals including growth factors (6), cytokines (14, 15) estrogen (16), and the Wnt pathway (17) can activate ILK. Direct regulators of ILK include phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) (6), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) (18), protein phosphatase 2C (19), ILKAP (20) and secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) (21). Accumulating evidence implicates ILK1 as a potential oncogene modulating several signaling pathways for cancer cell survival and tumor progression (22). Here, we will summarize key evidence for ILK signaling in hormonal tumor progression and discuss the possibility of the ILK1 axis as a possible therapeutic target for hormonal cancers.

3. DISCUSSION

3.1. ILK1 signaling and tumorigenesis

ILK1 signaling axis is implicated in many key signaling pathways that are activated in tumor cells promoting anchorage independence, motility, apoptosis, angiogenesis, EMT and tumor progression (22). Overexpression of ILK in epithelial cells enables anchorage-independent growth and survival of tumor cells (22-24) and tumorigenicity in nude mice (25). ILK1 overexpression in prostate cancer cells can suppress anoikis, promote anchorage-independence, and induce tumorigenesis (22). Accordingly, inhibition of ILK1 in prostatic adenocarcinoma (CaP) cells elicits cell cycle arrest and induces apoptosis (26).

Compared to normal cells, breast cancer cells appear to be preferentially dependent on the ILK1 signaling for survival (27). ILK1 function is also required for cytokine osteopontin (OPN)-induced AKT activation and for prostate cancer cell survival (28). Rictor, a known regulator of cytoskeletal dynamics, interacts with ILK1 to promote AKT phosphorylation leading to cell survival in cancer cells (29, 30). Transgenic mice expressing ILK1 in the mammary epithelium (MMTV-ILK1) develop a hyperplastic mammary phenotype and focal mammary tumors (31). These results provide strong evidence for an in vivo oncogenic role for ILK1 (31). Given the focal nature and long latency of the tumors, additional genetic events are likely required for tumor induction in MMTV-ILK1 mice.

ILK1-mediated AKT Ser473 phosphorylation may be celltype and context dependent. For example, genetic studies in Drosophila Melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans show AKT phosphorylation on Ser473 was not affected in ILK 1mutants (32, 33) and levels of Ser473 phosphorylation on AKT were equivalent in ILK1-null and wild-type mouse fibroblasts (34). The majority of analyses using tumor cells indicate that AKT Ser473 phosphorylation is dependent on a functional ILK1 axis; hence, the ILK1 pathway may be important during epithelial tumor progression presumably by promoting cell survival. In breast cancer cells, inhibition of ILK1 activity results in a decrease in AKT Ser473 phosphorylation and induction of apoptosis; whereas inhibition of ILK1 in normal cells has no such effects. These findings suggest that ILK1 promotes survival function uniquely in breast cancer cells. ILK1 targeted treatment using specific ILK1 inhibitors may therefore have potential to reduce side effects in cancer patients (27).

Evidence also implicates ILK1 in regulating tumor angiogenesis; ILK1 increases vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), modulate levels of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF1< ) and promote cell migration, blood-vessel formation and tumor growth of VEGF-treated endothelial cells (35, 36). In ovarian cancer cells, ILK1 serves as a key mediator in transforming growth factor (TGF) b1 regulation of uPA/PAI-1 system, which is critical for the invasiveness of human ovarian cancer cells (37). ILK1 promotes epithelial to mesochymal transformation (EMT) of cancer cells by modulating <-catenin/TCF, Snail and TGF< pathways (38-40). Collectively, these evolving findings indicate ILK1 signaling has the potential to activate multiple signaling pathways that contribute to the growth advantage of cancer cells.

3.2. Expression of ILK in hormonal cancers

While ILK1 is normally expressed in many hormonal tissues, emerging evidence implicates dysregulation of ILK1 expression and/or activity in many cancers including those of the breast, prostate and ovary (22). ILK1 expression increases as ovarian tumor grade and its expression can be sustained by peritoneal tumor fluid (PTF). PTF-induced over-expression of ILK correlates with the activation of the AKT pathway (41). Thus, ILK1 has potential to serve as a biological marker for early detection and a therapeutic target for ovarian cancer (41).

One study found that serum from ovarian cancer patients contains cell-free immunoreactive ILK1 at statistically elevated levels compared to controls without ovarian cancer (42); ILK1 was present at elevated levels in both the serum and PTF of ovarian cancer patients. The correlation between ILK1 expression with CA125 concentration in these biological fluids suggests a potential role of ILK1 as a serological ovarian tumor marker for early detection and treatment monitoring (43). Integrin alphavbeta3 upregulates ILK1 expression in human ovarian cancer cells via enhancement of ILK1 gene transcription. Mechanistic studies show that transcription factor Ets contributes to alphavbeta3-mediated ILK1 upregulation. By increasing ILK1 as an important integrin-proximal kinase, alphavbeta3 may promote its intracellular signaling and tumor biological processes (42).

ILK1 mRNA is upregulated in prostate adenocarcinoma cells compared to normal epithelial cells and therefore, can be a useful internal reference gene marker (44). ILK1 expression also increases with prostate tumor grade and is specifically associated with the increased proliferative index that typifies CaP progression. Further, enhanced ILK1 expression is inversely related to 5-year patient survival linking increased ILK1 expression in prostate tumor progression (26). b-parvin (ParvB) is an adaptor protein that binds to the ILK1. Expression studies indicated ParvB expression was down regulated in breast tumors compared to ParvB expression in patient-matched normal mammary gland tissue. These results suggest that loss of ParvB expression could be a mechanism for upregulating ILK1 activity in tumors (9).

3.3. Role of ILK1 in cancer cell metastasis

Metastasis is a frequent and fatal culmination to hormone-sensitive cancers, particularly of ovarian origin. Acquisition of invasive and migratory characteristics in cancer cells results primarily from adopting an EMT phenotype. This phenotype is supported by various pro-metastatic factors. Emerging studies have unraveled the role of ILK1 in governing metastatic features in various cancers, predominantly for acquiring the mesenchymal phenotype and promoting cell invasion through increased expression of various matrix-degrading proteases.

Increased expression of ILK1 correlates significantly with higher grade of ovarian tumors (41, 43). ILK1 played a predominant role in endothelin-1 (ET-1/ETAR)-induced EMT and in the development of the invasive phenotype in ovarian cancer by increasing levels of Snail, stabilizing beta-catenin and suppressing E-cadherin expression through a PI3K-dependent signaling pathway. Also, enhanced expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) mediated by ET-1 correlated with increased ILK expression (45). In addition, PI3K-ILK1 axis played a critical role in TGF β1-mediated invasive phenotype in ovarian epithelial cancer cells via up-regulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and PA inhibitor 1 (PAI-1). It is worthwhile to note that expression of uPA and PAI-1 were reported to correlate with advanced stages of ovarian cancer (46). Unlike ET-1, the TGF β1-mediated increase in MMP-2 expression was found to be independent of ILK1 signaling (37). Similarly, Y-box-binding protein 1 (YB-1), a known, poor prognostic marker of ovarian cancer, localized in the nucleus and enhanced CXCR4 expression for acquiring the malignant phenotype (47). Interestingly, siRNA depletion of ILK1 and AKT affects both nuclear translocation of YB-1 and expression of CXCR4 in ovarian cancer cells, suggesting that disrupting ILK1-AKT pathway can be used to block YB-1-mediated metastasis (48).

One of the earliest insights into the potential of ILK1 to govern the metastatic phenotype came from the Dedhar lab. They demonstrated that stable overexpression of ILK1 in scp2 murine mammary gland epithelial cell lines induced the classic EMT phenotype including reduction in E-cadherin along with translocation of β-catenin and formation of β-catenin/LEF complex inside the nucleus and thus upregulating expression of various mesenchymal genes (49). Similarly, Somasiri et al., found that forced exogenous expression of wild type ILK1 but not the dominant negative kinase-dead version of ILK in scp2 murine mammary epithelial cell lines induced the EMT phenotype via reduction in E-Cadherins and acquisition of vimentin filaments (39). Suppression of anoikis, a unique process of apoptosis resulting from insufficient cell-matrix adhesion, appears to be an important event in the development of metastasis (50). Studies using both scp2 murine mammary cell lines and human breast cancer cell lines implicated ILK1 as a suppressor of anoikis (24). Inhibition of cell death/anoikis by ILK overexpression supports the idea that ILK is a predominant player in regulating the emergence of the metastatic phenotype. Subsequent to these studies, ILK-mediated induction of the invasive phenotype in mammary epithelial cells was found to be associated with increased MMP-9 expression. This increase in MMP-9 proteins was attributed to ILK-mediated activation of GSK-3beta and AP-1 transcription factor (51). The ILK1-AP1 axis was further shown to contribute to the invasive phenotype in mammary gland epithelial cells mediated by osteopontin (OPN), a metastasis-associated glyco-phosphoprotein. Using the murine metastatic mammary epithelial cells 4T1, Mi et al., demonstrated that an OPN-mediated increase in expression of MMP2 and uPA can be attributed to ILK1-dependent AP-1 activation (14). Transgenic mice specifically expressing ILK in mammary glands had increased mesenchymal-like cell populations within their tumors, suggesting that stand-alone ILK1 overexpression can initiate the EMT phenotype (31). Another piece of evidence connecting ILK1 to anoikis is from a study that demonstrated the role of the tumor suppressor DOC-2/hDab-2 in the induction of anoikis in breast cancer cells. DOC-2 was shown to induce anoikis by down regulating ILK activity but this activity was found to be independent of the PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways, suggesting that ILK1 may utilize alternate pathways to suppress anoikis and promote anchorage independence (52). Estrogen-mediated extranuclear functions are also shown to activate ILK1. Since PELP1 expression is upregulated in metastatic breast cancer (53); modulation of the ILK1 pathway by PELP1 may represent a potential mechanism by which estrogen signaling promotes metastasis in breast cancer cells (54).

Relatively fewer studies have been done to elucidate the role of ILK1 in metastatic prostate, cervical and endometrial cancers. A recent study using prostate cancer cell lines implicated ILK1 as a downstream effector for talin1-mediated resistance to anoikis (55). It is worthy to note that talin1 was found to be overexpressed in metastatic prostate cancer and tumors with a high Gleason score when compared to its expression in normal Gleason scores and benign tumors (55). PI3K/AKT-dependent anoikis has also been found in endometrial cancer cell lines but the role of ILK1 in governing this anoikis has not yet been demonstrated (56). Similarly, Notch1-Rhoc axis and anoikis are reported to regulate the metastatic potential in cervical cancer progression but the role of ILK1 in these cancers remains elusive (57).

3.4. ILK and ER signaling crosstalk

Several lines of evidence implicate ILK1 axis crosstalk with ER signaling. One of the lacunae in our understanding of the mechanistic details of the metastatic evolution of these hormonal cancers and how hormones like estrogen and their respective steroid receptors regulate ILK1 pathway. Dr. Kumar's group provided first evidence of estrogen receptor (ER)-ILK crosstalk. They showed a direct interaction of ER with ILK1 and that the interaction occurred through the nuclear receptor box (i.e., LXXLL) located between the ILK1 pleckstrin homology-like domain and the ankyrin repeats (58). In addition, we recently identified ILK1 as a novel interacting protein of PELP1, an ER-coregulator protein (54). Our study demonstrated that ILK functions as a downstream effector of ER extranuclear signaling, leading to cytoskeleton reorganization. These extranuclear actions of estrogen facilitated activation of the ILK enzyme via the PI3K pathway and inhibition of ILK functions significantly affected the estrogen-mediated cell migratory potential. The proposed signaling pathway is E2>PELP1>PI3K>ILK>CDC42 and it may contribute to estrogen mediated cytoskeleton changes (54). Earlier evidence suggests that the ILK1 axis is a major signaling node that links integrins and growth factor signaling to a variety of cellular responses. The ability of ILK1 to interact with ER and growth factor/integrin signaling components suggests that deregulation of ILK has the potential to promote ER growth factor crosstalk and thus a potential to contribute to therapy resistance.

3.5. ILK1 and hormonal therapy resistance

Deregulation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ErbB2) expression and /or signaling has emerged as the most significant factor in the development of hormonal resistance (59). ErbB2 is an oncogene that has been shown to be over expressed, amplified, or both, in several human malignancies including breast tumors. ER expression occurs in ~50% ErbB2 positive breast cancers and crosstalk between the ER and ErbB2 pathways promotes endocrine therapy resistance (58, 59). Disruption of ILK expression by siRNA or inhibition of ILK1 function in ErbB2-expressing cells with a small molecule inhibitor resulted in a profound block in invasive properties resulting from the induction of apoptotic cell death. These observations support the concept of ILK1 having a critical role in the initiation phase of ErbB2 tumor induction (61).

AKT signaling plays an important role in the development of hormonal therapy resistance (62). Many hormonal tumors exhibit an increase in constitutively active AKT; however, mutations in AKT are rare in breast tumors (62). Therefore, proteins contributing to AKT activation may play a role in the development of therapy resistance. In this context, several lines of evidence indicate that ILK is a receptor-proximal effector for the PI3K-dependent, extracellular matrix- and growth factor-mediated activation of PKB/AKT and inhibition of GSK-3 (6). Since ILK1 expression is deregulated in hormonal cancer, increases in ILK1 signaling has the potential to contribute to therapy resistance.

Nuclear localization of PAK1, a proto-oncogene (63), is associated with the progressive limitation of tamoxifen sensitivity and implicated in development hormonal therapy resistance (64). ILK1 is a PAK1 substrate, and undergoes phosphorylation-dependent shuttling between the cell nucleus and cytoplasm, and interacts with gene-regulatory chromatin, thus ILK1-PAK1 interactions may have a role in therapy resistance (12).

Cyclin D1 overexpression commonly occurs in breast cancer. The level of cyclin D1 expression and activated STAT3 are important markers to predict response to tamoxifen treatment (65). ILK1 signaling increases cyclin D1 protein levels (65). Mechanistic studies showed that ILK-induced CREB transactivation and CREB binding to the cyclin D1 promoter CRE led to cyclin D activation. Wnt-1, an oncogene implicated in mammary tumorigenesis also induced cyclin D1 mRNA via ILK pathway (65).

ER-coregulators play an essential role in hormonal therapy responsiveness and cancer progression (67). Recent findings suggest that ILK1 interacts with ER-coregulator PELP1 (54) and that such interactions enhance ILK1-kinase activity. Since PELP1 expression is commonly deregulated in many hormone-responsive tissues (16), the PELP1-ILK1 interaction is likely to have significant implications in tumor cell survival and therapy resistance.

3.6. Therapeutic potential of targeting ILK in hormonal cancers

Current strategies to block the ILK1-mediated phenotype using in vitro systems include the usage of small molecular inhibitors (like KP-392/KP-SD-1 and QLT-0267) (27, 57, 68) and ILK-targeted siRNAs and antisense oligonucleotides (69). Also, the use of a dominant negative ILK (ILK-E359K) has been proposed. Initial work towards generating potent small molecule inhibitors against ILK1 was accomplished by Dedhar and colleagues in collaboration with Kinetek Pharmaceuticals (now a part of QLT Inc). As a result the KP-392/KP-SD-1 and KP-SD-2 compounds were identified and shown to inhibit ILK-mediated AKT activation and the EMT phenotype when tested using in vitro model cells. The use of KP-SD-1 was highly encouraging when tested on human colon carcinoma cells using an in vivo xenograft transplantation assay (70). QLT-0267 is a second-generation ILK1 inhibitor that is more potent with increased sensitivity over the parental KP-392 compound (27). Interestingly, QLT-2067 induces apoptosis in the breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435, BT-549, and MDA-MB-468, but not in normal human breast epithelial cells at a concentration of 10 �mol/L or less.

Some evidence indicates blockage of ILK1 signaling along with conventional chemotherapy may be beneficial. QLT-0267 in combination with docetaxel exhibited synergistic effects on reducing the viability of various breast cancer cells (68). A remarkable observation made in this study was that the ErbB2 status of cells has a definitive effect on this combinatorial treatment. Low ErbB2-expressing cells were more sensitive to this combination when reduction of phospho-AKT was used as endpoint for assessing the efficacy. Further, this combination was found to be more effective than the single treatment in reducing the tumor burden and prolonging survival in an orthotopic breast cancer model using transplanted LCC6 cells, which have reduced ErbB2 expression. Similarly, the ILK1 inhibitor KP-307-2, an analog of KP-392, was found to suppress tumorigenesis in xenograft tumor models using the prostate cancer cell line PC3. Surprisingly, a novel feedback mechanism between ILK and VEGF expression was also observed in this study and therefore treatment with ILK1 inhibitor causes a 'double jeopardy' situation in the cells by causing inhibition of tumorigenesis and suppressing angiogenesis (35).

The second generation ILK1 inhibitor QLT-0267 may be useful in radiosensitizing cancer cells, particularly squamous cell carcinoma cells of head and neck and also, engenders the possibility of similar effect on gynecologic cervical carcinoma that is predominantly squamous cell carcinoma upon histological type (71). Overall, it appears that ILK1 inhibitors, although at various levels of development, have the potential to down regulate ILK1 activity, the ILK1-mediated EMT phenotype and tumorigenesis when tested using in vitro and various pre-clinical mouse models.

4. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

In summary, the data reviewed herein provides support for the following conclusions:(a) deregulation of ILK1 expression and/or functions occurs in human hormonal cancers; (b) inhibition of ILK1 correlates with delayed tumor growth in preclinical models; (c) ILK1 can modulate key signaling pathways including cell survival, tumor growth, angiogenesis, EMT and metastasis; and (d) ILK1 crosstalk with various signaling pathways that are commonly deregulated in hormonal cancers including ErbB2, PAK1 and ER ((Figure 1). Thus, these data strongly support a role of ILK1 in the hormonal cancer progression. The recent availability of drugs that specifically target ILK1 has begun to open up new avenues for targeting hormonal tumors. Most interesting is the difference in sensitivity to the effects of ILK inhibition between normal breast epithelial and breast cancer cells, provide a potential for the use of ILK1 inhibitors in patient therapy. Future studies using combination of ILK inhibitors with drugs that target hormone therapy could possibly be done to achieve significant reduction in various hormonal cancers. Future studies are warranted to identify the signaling pathways that regulate ILK1 expression in hormonal cancers and to examine the prognostic / diagnostic significance of ILK1 using larger number of tumor samples. A better understanding of the ILK1 signaling and its crosstalk with hormonal signaling components is expected to assist in the development of an integrated model for targeting ILKs in the management of hormone-driven tumors.

5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the DOD W81XWH-08-1-0604 (RKV), NIH pre-doctoral fellowship CA095681 (VC), and DOD Pre-doctoral Fellowship W81XWH-09-1-0010 (BCN), Susan G. Komen post-doctoral fellow ship KG091267 (DC).

6. REFERENCES

1. S Persad, S Dedhar. The role of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) in cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev 22, 375-384 (2003)
doi:10.1023/A:1023777013659

2. GE. Hannigan, C Leung-Hagesteijn, L Fitz-Gibbon, M. G. Coppolino, G Radeva, J Filmus, J. C. Bell, S Dedhar. Regulation of cell adhesion and anchorage-dependent growth by a new beta 1-integrin-linked protein kinase. Nature 379, 91-96 (1996)
doi:10.1038/379091a0

3. S Dedhar, B Williams, G Hannigan. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK): a regulator of integrin and growth-factor signalling. Trends Cell Biol 9, 319-323 (1999)

4. PC McDonald, A. B. Fielding, S Dedhar. Integrin-linked kinase--essential roles in physiology and cancer biology. J Cell Sci 121, 3121-3132 (2008)
doi:10.1242/jcs.017996

5. JT Deng, J.E. Van Lierop, C Sutherland, M.P. Walsh. Ca2+-independent smooth muscle contraction. a novel function for integrin-linked kinase. J Biol Chem 276, 16365-16373 (2001)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M011634200

6. M Delcommenne, C Tan, V Gray, L Rue, J Woodgett, S Dedhar. Phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase-dependent regulation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 and protein kinase B/AKT by the integrin-linked kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 11211-11216 (1998)
doi:10.1073/pnas.95.19.11211

7. Y Tu, F Li, S Goicoechea, C Wu. The LIM-only protein PINCH directly interacts with integrin-linked kinase and is recruited to integrin-rich sites in spreading cells. Mol Cell Biol 19, 2425-2434 (1999)

8. SN Nikolopoulos, C.E. Turner. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK) binding to paxillin LD1 motif regulates ILK localization to focal adhesions. J Biol Chem 276, 23499-23505 (2001)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M102163200

9. PS Mongroo, CN Johnstone, I Naruszewicz, C Leung-Hagesteijn, RK Sung, L Carnio, AK Rustgi, GE Hannigan. Beta-parvin inhibits integrin-linked kinase signaling and is downregulated in breast cancer. Oncogene. 23, 8959-8970 (2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208112

10. S Yamaji. A Suzuki, Y Sugiyama, Y Koide, M Yoshida, H Kanamori, H Mohri, S Ohno, Y Ishigatsubo. A novel integrin-linked kinase-binding protein, affixin, is involved in the early stage of cell-substrate interaction. J Cell Biol 153, 1251-1264 (2001)
doi:10.1083/jcb.153.6.1251

11. Y Tu, Y Huang, Y Zhang, Y Hua, C Wu. A new focal adhesion protein that interacts with integrin-linked kinase and regulates cell adhesion and spreading. J Cell Biol 153, 585-598 (2001)
doi:10.1083/jcb.153.3.585

12. F Acconcia, CJ Barnes, RR Singh, AH Talukder, R Kumar. Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of nuclear localization and functions of integrin-linked kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 6782-6787 (2007)
doi:10.1073/pnas.0701999104

13. F Acconcia, B Manavathi, J Mascarenhas, AH Talukder, G Mills, R Kumar. An inherent role of integrin-linked kinase-estrogen receptor alpha interaction in cell migration. Cancer Res 66, 11030-11038 (2006)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2676

14. Z Mi, H Guo, PY Wai, C Gao, PV Kuo. Integrin-linked kinase regulates osteopontin-dependent MMP-2 and uPA expression to convey metastatic function in murine mammary epithelial cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 27, 1134-1145 (2006)
doi:10.1093/carcin/bgi352

15. H Sawai, Y Okada, H, Funahashi, Y Matsuo, H, Takahashi, H, Takeyama, T. Manabe. Integrin-linked kinase activity is associated with interleukin-1 alpha-induced progressive behavior of pancreatic cancer and poor patient survival. Oncogene 25, 3237-3246 (2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209356

16. D. Chakravarty, RR. Tekmal, RK Vadlamudi. PELP1: A novel therapeutic target for hormonal cancers. IUBMB Life 62, 162-169 (2010)
doi:10.1002/iub.287

17. A. Oloumi, S Syam, S Dedhar. Modulation of Wnt3a-mediated nuclear beta-catenin accumulation and activation by integrin-linked kinase in mammalian cells. Oncogene 25, 7747-7757 (2006)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209752

18. S Persad, S Attwell, V Gray, M Delcommenne, A, Troussard, J Sanghera, S Dedhar. Inhibition of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) suppresses activation of protein kinase B/Akt and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of PTEN-mutant prostate cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 3207-3212 (2000)
doi:10.1073/pnas.060579697

19. C Leung-Hagesteijn, A Mahendra, I, Naruszewicz, G.E. Hannigan. Modulation of integrin signal transduction by ILKAP, a protein phosphatase 2C associating with the integrin-linked kinase, ILK1. EMBO J 20, 2160-2170 (2001)
doi:10.1093/emboj/20.9.2160

20. A.S. Kumar, I Naruszewicz, P Wang, C Leung-Hagesteijn, GE Hannigan. ILKAP regulates ILK signaling and inhibits anchorage-independent growth. Oncogene 23, 3454-3461 (2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207473

21. MS Weaver, G Workman, EH Sage. The copper binding domain of SPARC mediates cell survival in vitro via interaction with integrin beta1 and activation of integrin-linked kinase. J Biol Chem 283, 22826-22837 (2008)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M706563200

22. G Hannigan, AATroussard, S Dedhar. Integrin-linked kinase: a cancer therapeutic target unique among its ILK. Nat Rev Cancer 5, 51-63 (2005)
doi:10.1038/nrc1524

23. G Radeva, T Petrocelli, E Behrend, C Leung-Hagesteijn, J Filmus, J Slingerland, S Dedhar. Overexpression of the integrin-linked kinase promotes anchorage-independent cell cycle progression. J Biol Chem 272, 13937-13944 (1997)
doi:10.1074/jbc.272.21.13937

24. S Attwell, C Roskelley, S Dedhar. The integrin-linked kinase (ILK) suppresses anoikis. Oncogene 19, 3811-3815 (2000)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203711

25. C Wu. SY Keightley, C Leung-Hagesteijn, G Radeva, M Coppolino, S Goicoechea, JA McDonald, S Dedhar. Integrin-linked protein kinase regulates fibronectin matrix assembly, E-cadherin expression, and tumorigenicity. J Biol Chem 273, 528-536 (1998)
doi:10.1074/jbc.273.1.528

26. JR Graff, JA Deddens, BW Konicek, BM Colligan, BM Hurst, HW Carter, JH Carter. Integrin-linked kinase expression increases with prostate tumor grade. Clin Cancer Res 7, 1987-1991 (2001)

27. AATroussard, PC McDonald, ED Wederell, NM Mawji, NR Filipenko, KA Gelmon, JE Kucab, SE Dunn, JT Emerman, MB Bally, S Dedhar. Preferential dependence of breast cancer cells versus normal cells on integrin-linked kinase for protein kinase B/Akt activation and cell survival. Cancer Res 66, 393-403 (2006)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2304

28. BW Robertson, MA. Chellaiah. Osteopontin induces beta-catenin signaling through activation of Akt in prostate cancer cells. Exp. Cell Res 316, 1-11 (2010)
doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.10.012

29. DD Sarbassov, SM Ali, DH Kim, DA Guertin, RR Latek, H Erdjument-Bromage, P Tempst, DM Sabatini. Rictor, a novel binding partner of mTOR, defines a rapamycin-insensitive and raptor-independent pathway that regulates the cytoskeleton. Curr Biol 14, 1296-1302 (2004)
doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.054

30. PC McDonald. A Oloumi, J Mills, I Dobreva, M Maidan, V Gray, ED Wederell, M.B. Bally, L.J. Foster, S Dedhar. Rictor and integrin-linked kinase interact and regulate Akt phosphorylation and cancer cell survival. Cancer Res 68, 1618-1624 (2008)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5869

31. DE. White, RD Cardiff, S Dedhar, WJ Muller. Mammary epithelial-specific expression of the integrin-linked kinase (ILK) results in the induction of mammary gland hyperplasias and tumors in transgenic mice. Oncogene 20, 7064-7072 (2001)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204910

32. CG Zervas, SL Gregory, NH Brown. Drosophila integrin-linked kinase is required at sites of integrin adhesion to link the cytoskeleton to the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol 152, 1007-1018 (2001)
doi:10.1083/jcb.152.5.1007

33. AC. Mackinnon, H Qadota, K.R. Norman,D.G. Moerman, B.D. Williams. C. elegans PAT-4/ILK functions as an adaptor protein within integrin adhesion complexes. Curr Biol 12, 787-797 (2002)
doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00810-2

34. T Sakai, S Li, D Docheva, C Grashoff, K Sakai, G Kostka, A Braun, A Pfeifer, P.D. Yurchenco, R, Fassler. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK) is required for polarizing the epiblast, cell adhesion, and controlling actin accumulation. Genes Dev 17, 926-940 (2003)
doi:10.1101/gad.255603

35. C Tan, S, Cruet-Hennequart, A, Troussard, L Fazli, P Costello, K Sutton, J Wheeler, M, Gleave, J Sanghera, S, Dedhar. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by integrin-linked kinase (ILK) Cancer Cell. 5, 79-90 (2004)
doi:10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00281-2

36. Y Kaneko, K Kitazato, Y Basaki. Integrin-linked kinase regulates vascular morphogenesis induced by vascular endothelial growth factor. J. Cell Sci. 117, 407-415 (2004)
doi:10.1242/jcs.00871

37. SW Lin, FC. Ke, PW Hsiao, PP. Lee, MT Lee, JJ Hwang. Critical involvement of ILK in TGFbeta1-stimulated invasion/migration of human ovarian cancer cells is associated with urokinase plasminogen activator system. Exp Cell Res 313, 602-613 (2007)
doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.11.003

38. MJ Barbera, I Puig, D Dominguez, S Julien-Grille, S Guaita-Esteruelas, S Peiro, J Baulida, C Franci, S Dedhar, L Larue, H.A. Garcia de. Regulation of Snail transcription during epithelial to mesenchymal transition of tumor cells. Oncogene. 23, 7345-7354 (2004)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207990

39. A Somasiri, A Howarth, D, Goswami, S Dedhar, C.D. Roskelley. Overexpression of the integrin-linked kinase mesenchymally transforms mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 114, 1125-1136 (2001)

40. Y Li, J Yang, C Dai, C Wu, Y Liu. Role for integrin-linked kinase in mediating tubular epithelial to mesenchymal transition and renal interstitial fibrogenesis. J Clin Invest 112, 503-516 (2003)
doi:10.1172/JCI17913
doi:10.1172/JCI200317913

41. N Ahmed, C Riley, K Oliva, E Stutt, GE Rice, M.A. Quinn. Integrin-linked kinase expression increases with ovarian tumour grade and is sustained by peritoneal tumour fluid. J Pathol 201, 229-237 (2003)
doi:10.1002/path.1441

42. D Lossner, C Abou-Ajram, A Benge, M, Aumercier, M, Schmitt, U Reuning. Integrin alphavbeta3 upregulates integrin-linked kinase expression in human ovarian cancer cells via enhancement of ILK gene transcription. J. Cell Physiol 220, 367-375 (2009)
doi:10.1002/jcp.21774

43. N Ahmed, K Oliva, GE Rice, MA Quinn. Cell-free 59 kDa immunoreactive integrin-linked kinase: a novel marker for ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10, 2415-2420 (2004)
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0042

44. N Kieffer, M Schmitz, S, Plancon, C Margue, F Huselstein, G, Grignard, W Dippel, M, Nathan, S Giacchi, R Scheiden. ILK as a potential marker gene to ascertain specific adenocarcinoma cell mRNA isolation from frozen prostate biopsy tissue sections. Int J Oncol 26, 1549-1558 (2005)

45. L Rosano, F Spinella, C Di, S Dedhar, M.R. Nicotra, PG Natali, A Bagnato. Integrin-linked kinase functions as a downstream mediator of endothelin-1 to promote invasive behavior in ovarian carcinoma. Mol. Cancer Ther 5, 833-842 (2006)
doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0523

46. G Hoffmann, K Pollow, W Weikel, H.J. Strittmatter, J Bach, M, Schaffrath, P Knapstein, F, Melchert, B Pollow. Urokinase and plasminogen activator-inhibitor (PAI-1) status in primary ovarian carcinomas and ovarian metastases compared to benign ovarian tumors as a function of histopathological parameters. Clin Chem Lab Med 37, 47-54 (1999)
doi:10.1515/CCLM.1999.007

47. Y Oda, Y Ohishi, Y Basaki, H Kobayashi, T Hirakawa, N Wake, M Ono, K Nishio, M Kuwano, M Tsuneyoshi. Prognostic implications of the nuclear localization of Y-box-binding protein-1 and CXCR4 expression in ovarian cancer: their correlation with activated Akt, LRP/MVP and P-glycoprotein expression. Cancer Sci 98, 1020-1026 (2007)
doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00492.x

48. Y Basaki, F Hosoi, Y Oda, A Fotovati, Y Maruyama, S Oie, M Ono, H Izumi, K Kohno, K Sakai, T Shimoyama, K Nishio, M Kuwano. Akt-dependent nuclear localization of Y-box-binding protein 1 in acquisition of malignant characteristics by human ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene 26, 2736-2746 (2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210084

49. A Novak, S.C. Hsu, C Leung-Hagesteijn, G Radeva, J. Papkoff, R, Montesano, C Roskelley, R Grosschedl, S Dedhar. Cell adhesion and the integrin-linked kinase regulate the LEF-1 and beta-catenin signaling pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 4374-4379 (1998)
doi:10.1073/pnas.95.8.4374

50. SM. Frisch, E Ruoslahti, E Integrins and anoikis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 9, 701-706 (1997)
doi:10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80124-X

51. A.A. Troussard, P Costello, T.N. Yoganathan, S Kumagai, C.D. Roskelley, S Dedhar. The integrin linked kinase (ILK) induces an invasive phenotype via AP-1 transcription factor-dependent upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) Oncogene 19, 5444-5452 (2000)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203928

52. SC Wang, K Makino, W Xia, JS Kim, SA Im, H, Peng, SC Mok, S.E. Singletary, M.C. Hung. DOC-2/hDab-2 inhibits ILK activity and induces anoikis in breast cancer cells through an Akt-independent pathway. Oncogene. 20, 6960-6964 (2001)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204873

53. HO Habashy, DG Powe, EA. Rakha, G Ball, RD Macmillan, A.R. Green, I.O. Ellis. The prognostic significance of PELP1 expression in invasive breast cancer with emphasis on the ER-positive luminal-like subtype. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120, 603-12 (2009)
doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0419-9

54. D Chakravarty. SS Nair, B Santhamma, BC Nair, L Wang, A Bandyopadhyay, JK Agyin, D Brann, LZ Sun, IT Yeh, FY Lee, RR Tekmal, R, Kumar, RK Vadlamudi. Extranuclear Functions of ER Impact Invasive Migration and Metastasis by Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Res 70, 4092-101 (2010)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3834

55. S Sakamoto, RO McCann, R Dhir, N, Kyprianou. Talin1 promotes tumor invasion and metastasis via focal adhesion signaling and anoikis resistance. Cancer Res 70, 1885-1895 (2010)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2833

56. S Kanayama, Y Yamada, R Kawaguchi, Y Tsuji, S Haruta, H Kobayashi. Hepatocyte growth factor induces anoikis resistance by up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in uterine endometrial cancer cells. Oncol Rep 19, 117-122 (2008)

57. S Srivastava, B Ramdass, S Nagarajan, M Rehman, G Mukherjee, S Krishna. Notch1 regulates the functional contribution of RhoC to cervical carcinoma progression. Br J Cancer 102, 196-205 (2010)
doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605451

58. F Acconcia, R Kumar. Signaling regulation of genomic and nongenomic functions of estrogen receptors. Cancer Lett 238, 1-14 (2005)
doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2005.06.018

59. R Schiff, SA Massarweh, J Shou, L Bharwani, G Arpino, M Rimawi, CK Osborne. Advanced concepts in estrogen receptor biology and breast cancer endocrine resistance: implicated role of growth factor signaling and estrogen receptor coregulators. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 56 Suppl 1:10-20., 10-20 (2005)

60. PK Marcom, C Isaacs, L Harris, ZW Long, A Kommarreddy, N Novielli, G Mann, Y Tao, MJ Ellis. The combination of letrozole and trastuzumab as first or second-line biological therapy produces durable responses in a subset of HER2 positive and ER positive advanced breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 102, 43-49 (2007)
doi:10.1007/s10549-006-9307-8

61. SM Pontier, L Huck, DE White, J Rayment, V Sanguin-Gendreau, B Hennessy, D Zuo, R St-Arnaud, GB Mills, S Dedhar, CJ Marshall, WJ Muller. Integrin-linked kinase has a critical role in ErbB2 mammary tumor progression: implications for human breast cancer. Oncogene (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
doi:10.1038/onc.2010.86

62. E Tokunaga, A Kataoka, Y Kimura, E Oki, K Mashino, K Nishida, T Koga, M Morita, Y Kakeji, H Baba, S Ohno, Y Maehara. The association between Akt activation and resistance to hormone therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 42, 629-635 (2006)
doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.025

63. PR Molli, DQ Li, BW Murray, SK Rayala, R Kumar. PAK signaling in oncogenesis. Oncogene 28, 2545-2555 (2009)
doi:10.1038/onc.2009.119

64. SK Rayala, PR Molli, R Kumar. Nuclear p21-activated kinase 1 in breast cancer packs off tamoxifen sensitivity. Cancer Res 66, 5985-5988 (2006)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0978

65. Y Ishii, S Waxman, D Germain. Tamoxifen stimulates the growth of cyclin D1-overexpressing breast cancer cells by promoting the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. Cancer Res 68, 852-860 (2008)
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2879

66. M D'Amico, J Hulit, DF Amanatullah, BT Zafonte, C Albanese, B Bouzahzah, M Fu, LH Augenlicht, L.A. Donehower, K Takemaru, RT Moon, R Davis, MP Lisanti, M Shtutman, J Zhurinsky, A Ben-Ze'ev, AA Troussard, S Dedhar, RG Pestell. The integrin-linked kinase regulates the cyclin D1 gene through glycogen synthase kinase 3beta and cAMP-responsive element-binding protein-dependent pathways. J Biol Chem 20;275, 32649-32657 (2000)
doi:10.1074/jbc.M000643200

67. R Kumar, H Zhang, C Holm, RK Vadlamudi, G Landberg, SK Rayala. Extranuclear coactivator signaling confers insensitivity to tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res 15, 4123-4130 (2009)
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2347

68. J Kalra, C Warburton, K Fang, L Edwards, T Daynard, D Waterhouse, W Dragowska, B.W. Sutherland, S, Dedhar. K Gelmon, M Bally. QLT0267, a small molecule inhibitor targeting integrin-linked kinase (ILK), and docetaxel can combine to produce synergistic interactions linked to enhanced cytotoxicity, reductions in P-AKT levels, altered F-actin architecture and improved treatment outcomes in an orthotopic breast cancer model. Breast Cancer Res 11, R25 (2009)
doi:10.1186/bcr2252

69. Q Li, YH Zhang, PL Li, JR Pei. Inhibitory effect of antisense oligonucleotide of integrin-linked kinase on cell proliferation of human epithelial ovarian cancer. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke. Za Zhi 43, 218-222 (2008)

70. C Tan, P Costello, j Sanghera, D Dominguez, J Baulida, A.G. de Herreros, S Dedhar. Inhibition of integrin linked kinase (ILK) suppresses beta-catenin-Lef/Tcf-dependent transcription and expression of the E-cadherin repressor, snail, in APC-/- human colon carcinoma cells. Oncogene 20, 133-140 (2001)
doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204052

71. I Eke, F Leonhardt, K Storch, S, Hehlgans, N Cordes. The small molecule inhibitor QLT0267 Radiosensitizes squamous cell carcinoma cells of the head and neck. PLoS One 4, e6434 (2009)
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006434

Abbreviations: AKT: protein kinase B; EMT:epithelial mesenchymal transition; ErbB2: epidermal growth factor receptor2; ER: estrogen receptor; ILK1: integrin linked kinase 1; Pak1:p21 activated kinase 1; ; PI3K: phosphotidyl inositol 3 kinase.

TGF:transforming frowth factor.

Key Words: Estrogen receptor, hormonal signaling, therapy resistance, integrin linked kinase, EMT, metastasis, AKT, ErbB2.

Send correspondence to: Ratna Vadlamudi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229, Tel: 2105674930, Fax: 2105674958, E-mail:vadlamudi@uthscsa.edu