![]() ![]() | [Frontiers in Bioscience 2, d232-241, June 1, 1997] Reprints PubMed CAVEAT LECTOR |
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
THE COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF PULMONARY INTRAVASCULAR
MACROPHAGES Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine University of California, Davis, CA
Received 4/11/97; Accepted 5/21/97
Experimental studies suggest that pulmonary intravascular
macrophages have a dominant role in the mononuclear phagocyte
system of mammals in the orders Artiodactyla and Perissodactyla.
These cells are involved in clearance of particles and debris
from the circulation and the immune response against blood-borne
and airborne pathogens. It is less clear what their importance
is to animals in the natural environment. Although various hypotheses
have been proposed to account for the presence of these macrophages,
it is uncertain why such a substantial and distinctive population
has evolved in some species and not others (4).
Much of the current research focuses on whether pulmonary
intravascular macrophages are induced in humans in certain pathological
conditions. Humans normally have few intravascular macrophages;
foreign particles in the circulation are localized in the liver,
phagocytized by Kupffer cells. However, gram-negative septicemia
or endotoxemia in humans often leads to acute lung injury (Adult
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, or ARDS) and it not understood
how pulmonary inflammation develops from systemically introduced
pathogens. Sheep and pigs are both used as experimental models
for ARDS in humans; possibly, humans develop intravascular macrophage-type
cells in the lung after endotoxemia or liver injury, making their
pulmonary circulations behave more like those in species with
resident intravascular macrophages. To determine if this is possible,
workers are attempting to induce a pulmonary intravascular macrophage
population in species without the cells by chronic endotoxin infusion
(4, 5, 7, 68). |